As a political movement which has
come into existence within recent decades the Provisional
Movements has the right to be and to pursue its political
aims but I cannot accept their contention to represent
the revolutionary republican tradition. In fact this
myth is fed by many in the media also but then the
press for political reasons must give the Provisionals
as much publicity as they can in order to ensure that
there will be no abandonment of constitutional partitionist
politics!
And there are no more stronger supporters of this
position than the so called
nationalist press.
For
like the fore runners of Fine Gael before them as
well as other so called republican groupings the Provisionals
have abandoned the revolutionary position. Part of
that position being that to enter any of the partitionist
assemblies (constitutional politics) was to contribute
towards the illegal assemblies continual existence:
a reality strictly opposed to Tone's immediate objective
of 'breaking the connection with England'.
In
their abandonment of the republican tradition we hear
or read of 'the evolution of Irish republicanism today',
fine words; but in reality a throwback to the decision
of the founders of Fianna Fail to follow the example
of Fine Gael and seek power within a partitionist
entity. With the latter it was the southern state
but with the Provisionals today it is both partitionist
states.
Of
course there are those who are sincerely of the opinion
that by entering the constitutional politics of both
states they will obtain their objective of a free
and self -determining Ireland in due course. A paradoxical
position in which there exists the contrary possibility
that the united Irelanders may well become more unionist
than the unionists themselves for power can corrupt
and in the words of the old Fenian leader John O'Leary
those who abandon the revolutionary path end up becoming
more constitutional than the constitutionalists. Here
the term constitutionalists canbe replaced with the
term partitionists.
There
exists some proof for this contention within the ideas
of a recent lecture by an ex- Prime minister of the
southern state, Garret Fitzgerald. Through his partitionist
constitutional experience Mr. Fitzgerald has now reached
the opinion that to have a united Ireland would be
too costly and that we should abandon the objective.
Such thinking is the essence of why he helped to formulate
the Anglo- Irish Agreement and indeed is the basis
for the present partitionist Belfast Agreement if
we but study the document objectively and in depth.
As for Leinster House as a whole there are many politicians
there (silent partitionists) who do not want a United
Ireland.
Having
engrafted themselves into the constitutional structures
imposed upon the people of Ireland, the Provisional
abandonment of authentic republican principle and
tradition is a mere imitation of failed endeavours
and in due course they will uphold partition while
paying lip service to the contrary. 'No!' 'Never!'
Wait and see...
As
implied I would defend the Provisionals right to pursue
the road of their choice but I cannot accept their
contention that they are mainstream republicans and
therefore the representatives of the centuries long
revolutionary struggle. In reality they are merely
accepting the role of the old northern Nationalist
Party as led by the late Eddie McAteer and the SDLP
in the north, and the Fianna Fail and Fine Gael parties
in the south. In doing so they are providing life
blood for the continuation of both states which hundreds
of brave men and women suffered and died in the struggle
to remove since partition was first imposed at the
beginning of the twentieth century and thousands more
for national freedom in the period prior to the blight
of partition.
No!
'real politik' is a carrot feeding those who innocent
or otherwise accept that their day has come but unfortunately
it is history repeating itself!
Index: Current Articles + Latest News and Views + Book Reviews +
Letters + Archives
|