The Blanket

The Blanket - A Journal of Protest & Dissent

Turning "Smoke ban" thing into ANTI-DIOXIN movement

John Jonik • 20 October 2005

Publican:

Who would be the right persons to contact with information and materials that could be used to stop, or certainly delay, any smoking bans?

The point is that the wording of laws and the "science" used to justify such laws is routinely either patently untrue or is based on unsound, sometimes famously discredited studies. Publicans, and customers who smoke, are being scapegoated to protect the interests that made most cigarettes excessively addictive and excessively, inevitably dangerous.

Please note that I am NOT making pleas for "rights to smoke". My point is about EVERYONE's right to not be secretly poisoned by product adulterants. I contend that there must be a ban on ANY untested and known harmful non-tobacco substances in cigarettes.

The bans, ironically, BENEFIT cigarette makers by casting blame and burdens of law onto OTHERS and onto a grossly under-studied natural plant. To my knowledge, no study of plain tobacco or smoke from plain tobacco has been presented in court or legislatures or elsewhere. Tobacco is being condemned and banned without a trial...often for diseases that are impossible to be caused by tobacco or any plant. If they say that "tobacco", by itself w/out adulterants, does this or that harm, simply ask for the studies that show this. One might point out that dioxin, in cigarette smoke from the pesticide residues and bleached paper, is ALREADY known to cause those diseases. Dioxin cannot suddenly be SAFE in cigarette smoke. I believe N. Ireland signed the POPs treaty to phase dioxin off the earth. Officials cannot now say that dioxin is of no concern.

Cigarettes are not defined for content that may include some of the most toxic, carcinogenic NON-Tobacco substances on earth...including dioxins and radiation. Tobacco is not defined or described to include, importantly, all the pesticide residues and hundreds of other adulterants. Smoke is not defined or described to differentiate it from an infinite number of other forms of smoke. Smoke from a singed marshmallow is quite different from smoke from a trash incinerator. Smokers are VICTIMS of what is nothing less than Secret Poisoning. No Informed Consent is sought or given so that smokers know what they are actually using...and it is NOT just tobacco by a long stretch.

Many of those who push for Smoke Bans are part of the cigarette cartel via pesticides, other chemicals and cigarette additives...and even insurance of and investment IN cigarette manufacturing. Their motive is to save the cigarette manufacturing and supply firms from indictments and liabilities for what they DID to the tobacco and the cigarettes...and the Guinea pigged consumers. If any witnesses are given credence to speak against "smoking", they MUST be scrutinized for any links to the so-far unpublicized parts of the cigarette industry. They MUST be asked, in public, preferably under oath, if they are referring to TOBACCO smoke, or to smoke from multi-ingredient, pesticide-contaminated, radiation-contaminated tobacco smoke. If they claim not to know, their expertise is shattered.

In the USA, there are many so-called "tobacco products" that many contain absolutely NO tobacco, but instead "tobacco substitute material" made in Patented processes to "simulate" tobacco. That is...this stuff is a lie by its camouflaged appearance, smell and taste. You cannot GET tobacco smoke from such products. I don't know if fake tobacco is legal in N. Ireland.

This is to say that Publicans, possibly also victims of dioxin/radiation contaminated smoke, must NOT be made to bear burdens of law for something for which they were not responsible. This is doubly true when one notices NO bans on untested and known deadly non-tobacco substances in typical cigarettes.

Please note that the ban promoters want it both ways: They say that "business improves" one day, then the next day they want to impose bans in neighboring jurisdictions so that customers do not flock to the ban-free locations.

If any official uses the term "tobacco" or "tobacco smoke" they must be required to DEFINE it for content.

I have a blog with references to the above and more. See: http://fauxbacco.blogspot.com It's not perfect but it's a start.

Publicans ought be outraged at being cast as villains for tolerating smoking, and for having to adjust any business policies for the benefit of those who've made most cigarettes so dangerous. It may be that Publicans have been on the receiving end of libelous statements. The officials who now don the halo of "wholesomeness" and "health" are the very ones who've allowed the toxic/carcinogenic adulterants to be in the products and who've never once warned consumers about the non-tobacco dangers. This halo can be removed from them by simply making it clear what typical cigarettes actually are...and they are not just tobacco. This will put the ban promoters on the ropes, deservedly so.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Index: Current Articles + Latest News and Views + Book Reviews + Letters + Archives

The Blanket - A Journal of Protest & Dissent



 

 

There is no such thing as a dirty word. Nor is there a word so powerful, that it's going to send the listener to the lake of fire upon hearing it.
- Frank Zappa



Index: Current Articles



23 October 2005

Other Articles From This Issue:

Badges? We Don't Need No Stinkin Badges
Mags Glennon

A Long Way Down
Anthony McIntyre

A Party of Their Own
Mick Hall

Reid's Sectarian Slur
Eamon McCann

Repeal Anti-Catholic Section of Act of Settlement 1701
Fr. Sean Mc Manus

Nicola McCartney & the Facts About Irish History
Seaghán Ó Murchu

Usual Suspects
Anthony McIntyre

Socialism in Ireland
Francis McDonnell

Turning "Smoke ban" thing into ANTI-DIOXIN movement
John Jonik

From the Classroom to the Grave
Anthony McIntyre

Yet More Voices Against Censorship
Davy Carlin

The Death Fast Enters its 6th Year
Tayad Committee

Setting Up Abbas
Jeff Halper


6 October 2005

A Bleak Future
Anthony McIntyre

Provos Censor de Chastelain in Bid to Lie About Guns
Tom Luby

Taking Politics Out of the Gun
Brendan O'Neill

Sinn Fein - The Shark's Party
Mick Hall

Live From Hollywood: The IRA Disarms
Harry Browne

Show Us the Money
Dr John Coulter

Doris Dead
Anthony McIntyre

Whatever Happened to... 'er, You Know... Whatshisname?
Tom Luby

The Dirty War Goes On
George Young

Reject All British Institutions
Kevin Murphy

Capitalism Vs Socialism
Liam O Ruairc

Apology to Dr Dion Dennis and CTheory website
Carrie Twomey

 

 

The Blanket

Home

 

 

Latest News & Views
Index: Current Articles
Book Reviews
Letters
Archives
The Blanket Magazine Winter 2002
Republican Voices